I think very similar this:

5268427070_931e09114a_o.jpg
Post edited January 26, 2012 at 12:06:47 PM by Lexotic
Nice find dude, now I understand why he covered the rear trunk.
:awesome:
dA
oh, that's why it looked so good -.-
79513086.png
Why? it doesn't look good now because it's copy pasted? no panel is identical to the donor so I see no reason in disliking it because it's not fully brushed :-q
Post edited January 26, 2012 at 06:59:18 PM by Pikumatti
I still like it :P you should your jaggy lines on the trunk shut lines.
avataroq.png
dzdesign.deviantart.com
1 person liked this.
Pikumatti wrote:
Why? it doesn't look good now because it's copy pasted? no panel is identical to the donor so I see no reason in disliking it because it's not fully brushed :-q
this has been discussed several times, i understand what he said, cause basicaly it doesnt looks so good now, cause its a mini pasted in a mini, nothing wrong with it, but people need to face it, obviously what we think it was a 3 hour job was probably a 10 minute job, thats why it doesnt look so good anymore. sorry to the autor, nothing against your chop, just my personal tasted, i dont like chops wich consist on pasting a same model car on top of another same model

ps. dont get me wrong, copy past is amazing and i use it to, but not pasting a green sphere into another blue sphere and expect people to clap

ps.s, people will probs shout at me saying "but the base isnt the same, compare the angles etc",
im not saying he grabed the WHOLE car and pasted it ona new bg, still, just compare the chop with the donor, and tell me how hard it is

..
as for the chop, i can still commen thte wrok done
wheels look very nice,
skirt looks strange with the black bits, they seem a bit flat
the far part of the trunk is toony, , and sort of has a strange perspective on the little bump near the rear lights
one thing i must say, the cabrio conversion is spot on, perfect
Post edited January 26, 2012 at 07:41:10 PM by hugosilva
hugosilva wrote:
Pikumatti wrote:
Why? it doesn't look good now because it's copy pasted? no panel is identical to the donor so I see no reason in disliking it because it's not fully brushed :-q
this has been discussed several times, i understand what he said, cause basicaly it doesnt looks so good now, cause its a mini pasted in a mini, nothing wrong with it, but people need to face it, obviously what we think it was a 3 hour job was probably a 10 minute job, thats why it doesnt look so good anymore. sorry to the autor, nothing against your chop, just my personal tasted, i dont like chops wich consist on pasting a same model car on top of another same model

ps. dont get me wrong, copy past is amazing and i use it to, but not pasting a green sphere into another blue sphere and expect people to clap

ps.s, people will probs shout at me saying "but the base isnt the same, compare the angles etc",
im not saying he grabed the WHOLE car and pasted it ona new bg, still, just compare the chop with the donor, and tell me how hard it is

..
as for the chop, i can still commen thte wrok done
wheels look very nice,
skirt looks strange with the black bits, they seem a bit flat
the far part of the trunk is toony, , and sort of has a strange perspective on the little bump near the rear lights
one thing i must say, the cabrio conversion is spot on, perfect
i agree tut tut
When that much of "your" work is that of another picture, you should probably be crediting the photographer of that picture instead, not yourself.
Artist formerly known as "Dev"
Back to top

Please login to post