Really the whole idea of Wikipedia is to offer open, free, unbiased information.
The 'Top 10 of chopping', is inevitably someone's opinion and therefore, biased.
Unless there is a competition to decide upon the Top 10, then it will remain biased..
I wouldn't mind writing up a history section if you guys don't mind. Not like i've been around since the beginning, but everyone knows where chopping first came from AND i was a member of digimods since 2004 which is kinda when chopping went mainstream. Then edit as applicable etc.
i just seen the "Top 10 Worldwide Automotive Artists (Active)" thing
and i wouldnt call naj active, he hasnt done a chop in over a year lol
i think jakusa should replace naj
Post edited February 11, 2010 at 09:31:53 PM by Zero
Hmmm, I think that (Active) think duplicates a lot... - i.e. half the legends are on it, so at least it shouldn't repeat their personal history, but give some sort of reason linked to some verifiable source that they deserve to be there perhaps ....