Yeah, I think it'd be too hard to get the handicapping right without advantaging and disadvantaging some. After all, we want our New choppers to improve and be promoted and I think with handicapping there'd be some that would try to exploit the system.

One thing I just realised is that if we do have level based leaderboards, we may need to vote more than the top ten choppers, as the places after ten are still important for the leaderboards (as this is where most of the inter and NCA choppers will get placed). That could pose a bit of a problem :/ Although the current drop and drag system would be fine for this, it's just a matter of getting the community to vote fairly.... or perhaps bring in judges?

Shifting topics...

I quite like how the competitions were run last year. Iconic cars with simpler base angles proved the most popular (entry wise) while the quirkier ones like the Jeep were less well received. I think it'd be wise to leave those quirky base images for the Miscellaneous comps and not the Autemo championships. It was also good to see entry numbers grow throughout the year.

Personally I think themed based comps (like the steampunk Jeep) should also be left for the Miscellaneous area with the Autemo Championships being just the straightforward competitions.
puszka321 wrote:
please video xD
MK211 wrote:
I really like the nos coming out of the rims
1 person liked this.
Agree with above.

So to summarise the past few posts:
->Some sort of average number of points scored to accommodate those who can't enter as regularly
->An extra bonus system so that those who participate often are rewarded for their activity, so that entering more comps still pays dividents
->NO to the level based leader boards and handicap points.
->Classic cars and simple base angles for the main comps, more obscure or themed ones for the miscellaneous comps :P

I think we can work with this though. Sounds cool :-d
125q72h.jpg
>>Latest Chop<<
| >>Like my Facebook Page<< | >>Basic Brushing Tutorial<<
2 people liked this.
Klaus wrote:
Shifting topics...

I quite like how the competitions were run last year. Iconic cars with simpler base angles proved the most popular (entry wise) while the quirkier ones like the Jeep were less well received. I think it'd be wise to leave those quirky base images for the Miscellaneous comps and not the Autemo championships. It was also good to see entry numbers grow throughout the year.

Personally I think themed based comps (like the steampunk Jeep) should also be left for the Miscellaneous area with the Autemo Championships being just the straightforward competitions.
Personally I think it should be the opposite. Generic 90's/early '00 coupé (even if it's a skyline or hachiroku) for miscellaneous competitions - and quirky, socially, culturally and economically relevant bases as main competition material.
The only reason we keep seeing Voltex kit #23589723 and 99% C+P jobs is because the bases are way too generic. Besides, with more relevant bases we can showcase the chops and potentially gain some outside interest.

They may not have such a big number of entries, but that is because of the challenge. We are talking about the best of the standalone choppers on Autemo here. We need to push people out of their comfort zone otherwise choppers like Hugo are just gonna fall into the same routine and easily churn out results. Last year's bases weren't very inspiring.
Artist formerly known as "Dev"
^ What he said tbh. As he said, more new cars so that Autemo can be relevant, and more challenging bases to keep the level up. The world really doesn't need more early 80's Corolla cuopes (which were a lame rip-off of the Escort RS2000 anyway :P) or 4wd 90's Datsuns :)
And throw in some SUV's and Luxury cars too.
Themed chops, even as much as I love them, tend to really challenge people a lot more (as seen by the fewer entries) as the outcome is bound to be more similar, so they get to be more about the actual work than the ability to just 'stand out in the crowd'
Anonymous voting won't work, even if it would make it more fair, so it will still be mostly a popularity contest, (with some fair votes thrown in )
Some men just want to watch the world doing burnouts... :P
bannerda.jpg bannerfb.jpg
Construct wrote:
Personally I think it should be the opposite. Generic 90's/early '00 coupé (even if it's a skyline or hachiroku) for miscellaneous competitions - and quirky, socially, culturally and economically relevant bases as main competition material.
The only reason we keep seeing Voltex kit #23589723 and 99% C+P jobs is because the bases are way too generic. Besides, with more relevant bases we can showcase the chops and potentially gain some outside interest.

They may not have such a big number of entries, but that is because of the challenge. We are talking about the best of the standalone choppers on Autemo here. We need to push people out of their comfort zone otherwise choppers like Hugo are just gonna fall into the same routine and easily churn out results. Last year's bases weren't very inspiring.

I know where your coming from here, but I don't think choosing quirky bases discerns the good choppers from the worse, but those that are willing to tough it out. There's a reason why Hugo, RAS and rc82 did well in the competitions last year (which had more simple and easy bases) and it's because they have the skills - they're all Elite. And from what I've seen, it's not the 99% C&P or the same old stuff that does well in the comps but the brushed works with originality. I don't see much C&P in the top chops here. Obviously as you go down the list there will be a bit more C&P, but that's only because those choppers are less skilled (which makes sense as they should be placed lower) and their brushwork is not up to scratch... but at least they still have the opportunity to submit something that looks quite polished.

So in my opinion the Autemo Championships should be a platform for all choppers to compete, where members know what to expect each competition. I believe that it'll build interest in the forum (boosting the number of active members) and help to develop a consistent influx of new members wishing to participate in simple and regular competition. The miscellaneous competitions should stay as they're defined - for those competitions that don't fit in elsewhere. And that's exactly what themed comps, socially relevant and other quirky comps are... ones that don't fit in ;)

So why not introduce a competition that runs along side the Autemo Championships, including all those quirky and relevant bases? I actually suggested a very similar idea to what went on in this thread over a year ago. I'll post it here as it's pretty relevant.
Klaus wrote:
I think ATC has the best idea here. I think any other method would be too complicated. The ratings system would have to be based on competitions - after all every sport I can think of is based on competitions. In my opinion, being able to produce work when you're either pressured for time or lacking inspiration shows the true ability of a chopper - it shows they're able to produce quality work when their out of their comfort zone. It will also mean a more diverse portfolio for the choppers who compete.

Continuing this idea of competitions, they need to be more specific to particular styles of chopping. Perhaps there could be a brushing challenges, copy and paste challenges and then possibly JDM, VIP or DUB, Time attack, concepts, etc. based competitions. This, as I said, will show the true ability of a chopper. For example, someone like nordic man who brushes all of his chops may wish to compete in the copy and paste competition to have a go at something different. Of course if he doesn't want to compete he doesn't have to, but it would show he has the ability to produce quality work outside of his comfort zone. For someone like myself who does a lot of time-attack/JDM style chops, it would be a breath of fresh air to try something like a concept car. For example - take the 2011 Subaru WRX and redesign it for 2012, bringing it back to it's roots - or something like that.

**Snip, snip** (irrelevant paragraph)

With the results there could be two tables. One for overall votes or points received and another for the average points received per competition (for those people who had competed in at least a certain amount of competitions - possibly half). This would give those people who don't have the time to compete in every competition the ability to see how they compare at least.

I was also just pondering about the "preferred style" on the portfolios. Perhaps there could be some sort of bonus for the people who compete in styles other than their preferred style. This would promote choppers going outside of their preferred style of chopping, widening their horizons and portfolio.

Just noticed that ATC's idea of "average points per comp" was ripped off me!!! :P I knew it sounded familiar XD

So in summary....

- The Autemo Championships should stay as they are - a regular and easy competition for choppers of all levels to participate
- A new championship, perhaps the "Miscellaneous Championships", could be introduced to offer a breath of fresh air for those choppers bored of the Autemo Champs format (as explained it would also show those choppers able to adapt and chop when lacking inspiration).
Post edited January 15, 2012 at 07:42:38 AM by Klaus
puszka321 wrote:
please video xD
MK211 wrote:
I really like the nos coming out of the rims
I like what construct said more, there's too many JDM bases for the comp, and most of them are chopped by people many many times, just that bases might have a different angle. Why not some other bases like luxury sedans or american cars or maybe korean cars? there's really a less number of chops of them out there.
:awesome:
dA
Klaus wrote:
Autemo Championships should be a platform for all choppers to compete, where members know what to expect each competition.

+1
Klaus wrote:
Just noticed that ATC's idea of "average points per comp" was ripped off me!!! :P I knew it sounded familiar XD

Erm.. my post about average scores was above your post about average scores? XD Take a look. I suggested average points before you even posted on the thread XD I think you'll find that you ripped the idea of me ;) ;)

Anyway yeh - generic bases are better - everyone enjoys them and gives everyone a chance to compete. And what's wrong with c+p anyway? C+p is a skill itself ...
125q72h.jpg
>>Latest Chop<<
| >>Like my Facebook Page<< | >>Basic Brushing Tutorial<<
To me, I think there should be rounds for New choppers, Intermediate choppers and so on. So then it's fair for the new and more experienced choppers. As it stands now, if I wanted to enter, it'd have no chance what so ever of coming even close to winning. Everyone else is just so much more experienced.

If not that, I believe that there should be a brush and non-brush section. There are some people, like me who cannot brush. And If I did get in, I wouldn't go very far at all. Everyone just seems to go over the top, and make the cars look- well. Un-realistic with all the brushing.

But that is just how I feel about it. I do see it fair that the newer choppers don't have a chance. I really don't.
I prefer engine oil and overalls to nail polish and fashion any day♥
1 person liked this.
While I dont want to discredit the copy and pasters, we've moved far from the original copy and paste style that meshed bits together in order to form something new entirely. That's what chopping is to me, innovation. Those that were succesful at that style of copy and pasting have always been able to measure with the advanced brushers. But it seems to be a lost art.

While i agree the extreme brushers with no sense of practicality and functionality go too far into unrealism, same could be said for the pasters who litterally copy so much that they would lose image rights to their own chops by copyright law.

This is why it's important to use relevant bases, because with generic bases, people go to extremes to stand out in the sea of mediocrity.
Post edited January 15, 2012 at 06:28:59 PM by Bart
Artist formerly known as "Dev"
ATC Design wrote:

Anyway yeh - generic bases are better - everyone enjoys them and gives everyone a chance to compete. And what's wrong with c+p anyway? C+p is a skill itself ...

Yes, I think the bases should be generic, but relevant, and some of the rounds need to be more challenging.
And about C+P, yes, without C+P there wouldn't be chopping, only rich kids with tablets :P
The problem is some people post a Golf 4 as the original, and the chop is a really nice stanceworks A3 pic, with the headlights from the so-called original. Nothing wrong with C+P if they are honest about their donors, but some people always vote them higher without checking how little work went into them. (I myself take great pride in almost always using more than 4 donors, unless I use none at all :P)
Edit, See Constructs post :P
And I will always go through hell and back to make mine stand out in the crowd, even if no-one notices...
Post edited January 15, 2012 at 06:09:16 PM by Zykotec
Some men just want to watch the world doing burnouts... :P
bannerda.jpg bannerfb.jpg
Back to top

Please login to post